Sinicization, Chinafication, or Zhongguohua
Developing Chinese religions is not a socio-cultural or religious concern but one of international relations and national security.
We’ve decided to turn back a page in our history and restore the name of our flagship publication from ChinaSource Quarterly back to ChinaSource Journal.
Christianity has endured over 1,300 years of history in China, weathering many challenges and undergoing a long course of “assimilation.”
Can Zhongguohua be equated with the notion of indigenization? An attempt to draw a comparison is pursued through the lens of three distinctive dimensions.
一面防範境外宗教「滲透」,一面推動中國宗教「走出去」。這兩種看似相反的方向,如何共同構成「基督教中國化」的內外戰略?
Sinicization is the UFWD’s agenda for Chinese religious associations. All religions are to be Sinicized, even Taoism. But the challenge of bringing “foreign religions” like Christianity and Islam into the Party’s agenda requires increased effort.
Xi’s directive to align all religions with Zhongguohua is not only rooted in academic and institutional history but is also deeply embedded in the traditions of the official Protestant church.
The work is a must-read for anyone concerned with the direction of Chinese religions and China’s religious policy.
Sinicization, Chinafication, or Zhongguohua? Defining the term in question goes to the heart of understanding China’s current policy and its effect upon religious believers.
Here are some sources that may interest ChinaSource readers concerned with religious life and religious policy in contemporary China, with a thematic focus on Protestant Christianity.
定期寄送
有些問題,值得花時間深入思考。《華源期刊》每期聚焦一個重要議題,匯集學者、牧者與事工實踐者的研究、觀察與反思,從歷史、神學到當代教會生活,帶領讀者探索華人基督教更豐富、更深刻的面貌。